The future of UK electoral administration

Toby James gave the opening talk at the Association of Electoral Administrators conference in Brighton on Sunday night.  The topic of the talk was ‘From here to where? Modernisation of electoral administration in Britain.’  In this post he looks at how the way we run elections can be made improved after May.

Elections receive widespread coverage in the news and media.  Many (normal) people will already be fed up with the media coverage on the UK general election in May, even if politicians, journalists and academics aren’t.  But the focus is usually on the outcomes, parties and candidates.  It is usually rare that we focus on the mechanics of how the election is run.

This is a major issue in the UK, however, because electoral registration rates are hitting crisis levels.  Back in 2012 the Electoral Commission estimated that one in five people are not on the register.  This is before the effects of individual electoral registration (IER) are felt, which is widely thought to lead to a decline in registration levels.  This week the UK will see a second National Voter Registration Day, organised by Bite the Ballot, to which civil society is being recruited to help drive up registration rates.  At UEA students are organising a ‘goats for votes’ event. Even Ricky Tomlinson has added his voice to the cause.

With this in mind, I explored whether the registration and voting process could be made more convenient for the citizen.  The methods used to run elections in Britain have Victorian origins.  The methods for conducting the poll, for example, has its roots in the 1872 Secret Ballot Act.  Society has changed and moved on since then.

I explained that research has shown the following to be effective at increasing registration and turnout levels:

There is therefore a strong case for making these long term policy goals for 2025.

I stress 2025 and not 2020 because all of these goals would involve significant implementation challenges, which were widely discussed at the conference.  And we should listen carefully to the electoral community in moving forward.  They are uniquely placed to understand such challenges as they are on the front line of democracy.

As many administrators will tell you, the problem with the proposal for election-day registration is that when people currently register to vote online (it is great that they can now do this) the process is not yet finished.  Usually unbeknown to the voter, their details will be checked against government databases before their registration can be verified.  Electoral administrators need to time oversee this process.   Given that May 2015 will be first election under IER, they will need plenty of time to do this.

Likewise, it will take time to build safe and secure online voting systems.  Weekend voting is a challenge because electoral officials struggle to find premises.

Setting longer term goals, however, will allow a sense of direction forward.  Electoral administrators, academics, the media and civil society should work together to forge an agenda for how elections can be reformed.  This is important so that elections are not reformed with only a 5 year plan, set by governments who will have a watchful eye on how they can change the law to make it easier for them to win their next contest.

Planning ahead, we need to think about electoral administration in the round.  The side effects of reforms need to be considered.  IER, for example, might have reduced opportunities for electoral fraud.  However, as I warned in 2011, it may also lead to reduced registrations, involve extra costs, cause election officials to retire early or outreach schemes to end.  Elsewhere, I have proposed a framework for assessing electoral management to encourage us to think about this more holistically.

Most analysis of electoral administration usually ends there.  But I think that the ‘back office’ of elections are also important.  The policies that affect the people who run elections can facilitate better run elections.  This is especially important because it that it is becoming harder and harder to run elections.  Many electoral officials are having to ‘run faster, to standstill’.  We therefore need to:

We need a debate after May about how electoral administration can be improved for the long term.  In the meantime, it is all hands on deck to encouraging friends, colleagues and family members to register to vote.  Or as Jim Royle puts it more directly:

“Hey you, you lazy little sod, go and vote and get your mates to vote instead of just sitting there watching the telly.

Dr. Toby James is a Senior Lecturer in British and Comparative Politics at the University of East Anglia.

About the Author

3 thoughts on “The future of UK electoral administration

  1. The emphasis on increasing participation is laudable. The problem is how to introduce all-postal or online voting without increasing electoral fraud. The problems with enforcing electoral law would be less if administrators actually enforced the RPA, rather than calling on the law to be simplified to fit with what they feel they can be bothered to enforce. ROs are paid a lot of money for what they do, they have the luxury of existing in a non-audited land free from FoI requests; as a voter, just asking that they don’t f*** it up does not seem unreasonable.

  2. Whilst making it easier to vote may increase voter Turnout the on its own its not the solution.

    People will only vote and participate in civic life if they feel that they have ownership of the problems and solutions of the issues that effect them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You may also like these